The court ordered Craig Wright to provide documents …

The court ordered Craig Wright to provide documents …

The court ordered Craig Wright to provide documents by March 12, rejecting the declaration of the Kenyan lawyer

Craig Wright is obliged to provide the documents requested by the court by March 12, despite all the objections on his part. This decision was made on Monday by the District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Earlier, Wright refused to disclose these documents, citing the confidentiality of his communication with a lawyer..

Wright backed up his arguments with a letter from Kenyan lawyer Denis Bosire Mayaka that was not notarized. “I am a lawyer and received my Bachelor of Laws in 2007 from Moi University in Kenya. I have represented Dr. Craig Stephen Wright since 2012 in his investment affairs. Specifically, I represent Dr. Wright and Wright International Investments Ltd in relation to the Tulip Trust documents, including the Tulip Trust dated July 7, 2017, ”the lawyer allegedly wrote. To prove his qualifications, Wright provided a printed version of his profile on the business social networking site LinkedIn..

Judge Bruce Rhinehart was not satisfied with such evidence: “First, as a source of justice, I reject the Mayaka declaration because it was not duly confirmed. In particular, I take into account that Wright was previously convicted of providing forged documents in this case, and I refuse to rely on such documents, which could easily be created by anyone with a text editor and a pen. “.

The court ordered Craig Wright to provide documents ...

On March 9, 2019, Rhinehart instructed Wright to provide a list of bitcoin addresses containing over a million bitcoins that were the subject of litigation with the family of his deceased business partner Dave Kleiman. Wright claims that it was he who created bitcoin, but cannot access the assets, since they were transferred to the trust management. In January, he provided a list of Bitcoin addresses allegedly sent to him by courier.

Now the court wants to know exactly how he got this list. Wright responded that the details of his communication with the courier were protected by the principle of confidentiality. Rhinehart determined that Wright did not have such a privilege, and the available information did not allow to establish whether Mayaka was indeed the legal counsel of the trust. “He has been assigned a different role,” Reinhart noted..

The court ordered Craig Wright to provide documents ...

Similar articles

admin